It's a matter of interpretation of facts on the ground.  You interpret one
way, I the other.

 

arthur

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of de Bivort
Lawrence
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 6:26 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Hatred against Israel organizing principle of the
Middle East

 

It is not a matter of "views," it is a matter of facts.

 

To your statement and your language:  please tell us what Arab armies were
"massed" and provoked the 1948 and 1956 war.  

 

 

 

 

On Aug 6, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Arthur Cordell wrote:





We have been through this before.  You have your views and I have mine. 

 

Arthur

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of de Bivort
Lawrence
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 10:26 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Hatred against Israel organizing principle of the
Middle East

 

Please tell us what Arab armies were "massed" and provoked the 1948 and 1956
war.  

 

Then we'll address the 1967 war.

 

 

On Aug 6, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Arthur Cordell wrote:






Re: the 1948, 1956, and 1967 wars being the cause of such anger at Israel.
I think rather than the wars it was because the massed Arab nations that
provoked the wars ended up losing.  It was the loss on the battlefield and
the loss of face that continues to rankle.  But there are other currents at
work in the ME, and it is the reaction to modernism.  And this is also seen
in Israel with the strength of the religious groups.

 

If Israel disappears it will be a short term victory,  the fight against
modernism will continue.

 

arthur

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of de Bivort
Lawrence
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 8:25 AM
To: Keith Hudson; RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Hatred against Israel organizing principle of the
Middle East

 

Good morning, Keith.  Yes, Muslims view Jews, Christians (broadly defined)
and Muslims all as "Ahl al-Kitab" -- People of the Book. All the early
converts to Islam were, of course, Jewish, Christian, or pan- and
polytheistic. Converting to Islam was not difficult for Jews and Christians,
as they and Muslims have the same god. So conversion simply meant
understanding that Muhammad was the most recent of the prophets/messengers/
sent by God/Yahweh/Allah, and taking the Qur'an as the last and literal
message/voice of Allah.  If you will, you can think of Muhammad and the
Quran as the 'latest edition.'

 

Would you say more about the effect of Sunni-Shi'a tension on
Muslim-non-Muslim relations?  Thanks.

 

My sense is, and this summarizes many disparate conversations with
Arabs/Muslims about Israel, is not that Israeli technological and scientific
success provokes them against Israel, but that the seizure of Palestine; the
current onerous and murderous occupation; the Israeli black ops against
Arabs and Muslim countries; and the 1948, 1956, and 1967 wars are the cause
of such anger at Israel.

 

Israel's technological succes is something that many Palestinians, Arabs and
Muslims admire, though the relative debauchery of some segments of the
Israeli Jewish population do not.  Of course, the Arabs have their own
record of world-class debauchery among some of their elites -- a source of
considerable resentment and contempt among the general population.

 

Or an interpersonal level, Israelis and Palestinians (and Arabs/Muslims)
generally can get along fairly easily. Indeed I know of many deep and
lasting friendships between them, including marriages.

 

Cheers,

Lawry

 

 

On Aug 6, 2012, at 7:11 AM, Keith Hudson wrote:







Muhammad enjoined his followers to treat Jews and Christians with respect,
as fellow believers in the Bible (that is, the old testament) and partners
of the Abrahamic line. What has coloured Muslim's attitude to non-Muslims is
a byproduct of the growing overlay of antipathy between the Sunnis and Shias
of their own faith. Also, I feel sure that the scientific and technological
successes of Israel in recent years, rather than its mere existence, have
been provocative. 

Keith

At 20:53 05/08/2012, Arthur wrote:





Just to provide some more perspective on the very unstable middle east.  
 


Israel, the Arab world's all-purpose enemy




George Jonas <http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/author/gjonasnp/>  | 

Aug 4, 2012 6:01 AM ET |

Last Updated: Aug 4, 2012 9:48 AM ET

National Post

And how is the Arab Spring? Well, there's bad news, and good news. The bad
news is that since the beginning of the phenomenon that has been discussed
more and understood less than any in recent years, hostility to Israel in
the region has only increased. The good news is that while the appetite to
harm the Jewish state and its inhabitants has grown in the Arab/Muslim world
since the fall of Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia launched what was
supposed to be the region's democratic renewal, the capacity to do so has
diminished.

An increase in hostility was predictable. Hatred against Israel, kept on a
low boil, is the organizing principle of the Middle East. It's the region's
main fuel of governance; often its only fuel. Some ruling regimes - kings,
dictators, whatever - may have oil wells and sandy beaches, but other than
hating Israel (and looking after their families and tribes) they have few if
any ideas. If they do, chances are it's to hate some other group in addition
to Israel.

In the Middle East a country's national purpose often amounts to little more
than a list of its enemies. A feeling of being ill-done by dominates the
consciousness of groups and individuals. Since it's a self-fulfilling
prophecy, it's not necessarily baseless: The easiest way to have an enemy is
to be one.

The centrality of hatred to the culture is remarkable. The Cartesian idea is
"I hate, therefore I am." Self-righteousness is overwhelming: each desire
thwarted becomes an example of justice denied. It's not a pretty place, but
millions call it home.

In many ways, Israel is a godsend to the one-trick ponies who rule the
region. Their culture defines "ruling" as inoculating your own sect or tribe
against all others, including the ones that form your own country. Many
Middle East nations - Iraq, Syria, Libya, to name three - are just
temporarily halted civil wars. They're truces rather than countries. Canada
may be "two solitudes," but it isn't an uneasy truce between French and
English Canadians. Iraq is, between Shia and Sunni Muslims.

In such an ambiance, nothing is handier than an all-purpose enemy, just out
of reach, close enough to seem a realistic threat but too far to be one.
Tyrants can govern by whipping up enough popular sentiment against the
Jewish state to give their regimes an apparent national purpose and distract
people's attention from domestic woes, then relax and spend some money in
the capitals of Europe.

The key is a low boil, though. If the anti-Israeli sentiment boils over,
causing riots against the government for being too soft on the Zionists, or
foolish attempts to attack Haifa with rockets, which in turn invites
retaliation, the people's hatred of Israel becomes a headache for the very
rulers who instigated it.

"Yeah, well, it couldn't happen to a nicer bunch," somebody might say, "I'll
lose no sleep over it." He should, though, because it's like pulling a
thread from a piece of fabric. Things can unravel in an instant.

Tyranny, Egyptian-style, under Hosni Mubarak or Libyan-style, under Muammar
Gaddafi, often manifested itself in dictatorial governments balancing on a
tightrope, trying to maintain a fragile peace with Israel against their own
bellicose people, trying to counteract the effects of the sentiments they
themselves instigated. When they couldn't, the forces they helped conjure up
turned against them. If lucky, they died in a hail of bullets on the
reviewing stand like Anwar Sadat; if not, bludgeoned like a cornered rat in
a culvert, in the manner of Gaddafi. It's a fate Bashar al-Assad has been
trying to avoid, which is hardly surprising.

Assad "has threatened to rain missiles down on Tel Aviv should NATO try to
dislodge him," as Michael Koplow put it
<http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/how-the-arab-spring-keeps-israel-saf
e-7268>  in the National Interest, but in fact Syria's tyrant has been
raining missiles (and if not missiles, then shells and bullets) on his own
towns and villages. No wonder, for that's where his enemies live - his
actual enemies, as opposed to his mythical ones. It's his fellow Syrians who
want to trap him in a culvert and drown him, preferably along with his
entire tribe. Israel has no interest in touching him with a 10-foot pole,
especially as long as he's keeping Syria's armed forces and rebels thinning
each other's ranks.

We won't understand much about the Arab Spring as long as we persist in
looking at it through Western eyes. We see popular uprisings against
dictatorships as moves in the direction of Western-style democracy. If they
happened here, they probably would be. Where they're actually happening
they're taking their societies in the opposite direction.

The Arab Spring is an attempt to return the region to its roots. It's not to
Westernize the Middle East and make it more democratic; it's to Easternize
it and make it more Islamic. If the early 20th century was about the East
trying to join what it couldn't lick, the early 21st may be about the East
trying to lick what it hasn't been able to join.
 
 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/> 
  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to