Lawry, I agree completely. Bush's position is that any group providing armed resistance to a group he supports qualifies as terrorists. The IMF has, through its policies and crossing the palms of strong men, probably killed more people than many of the groups Bush has fingered.
I have not evaluated the links below but they do make for some interesting reading: http://www.foe.org/international/imf/ http://www.globalizethis.org/fightback/#wbimf http://www.50years.org/institutions/index.html http://www.50years.org/institutions/index.html http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/stop-imf http://www.globalexchange.org/economy/rulemakers/ http://www.ifg.org/imf.html http://www.zmag.org/ParEcon/palastimf.htm http://members.aol.com/gafrin/imf.htm http://www.cepr.net/IMF/ The one that blew me away was this by Jeff Sachs, one of the guys who brought us the current Russian economic situation. Now if you ignore the others, it is hard to ignore this guy. Incidentally, I have been involved, in a small way, in planning for the current Turkish National Health Survey, funded by the World Bank. You may not know it, but a recent study by one of the Bank's health gurus indicated that the US has the world's most responsive health systems. As an American, I'm glad that I now know that! [:>)}. Bill Ward On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:30:29 -0400 "Lawrence DeBivort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guerillas, freedom fighters, resistance fighters, maquis, > terrorists, > commandos, assassins, special ops, wet ops, minute men.... > > The term we choose will reflect whose side they and we are on. > > Can you think of any other similar terms? > > Lawry > > > > >
