But, if people can't afford them, why did I make them?
Your Homeless bit is meaningless.
Harry
--------------------------------------------------
Darryl and Natalia wrote:
But what if, through attrition, cutbacks, downsizing and the need for higher stock dividend returns, very few people in the community could afford your $50 million worth of goods and/or services?
Who relaxes on the beach then? The Homeless?
Darryl
----- Original Message ----- From: Harry Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 2:10 PM Subject: Re: [Futurework] Exit ramp for Europe (collateral damage on Tar C reek)
> Bill, > > That's called shifting grounds. > > Say there was no pollution and no health care costs? > > Then, how can I be faulted for supplying the community with $50 million > worth of goods and/or services? > > Feel better? > > Harry
**************************************************** Harry Pollard Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 Tel: (818) 352-4141 -- Fax: (818) 353-2242 http://home.attbi.com/~haledward ****************************************************
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.486 / Virus Database: 284 - Release Date: 5/29/2003
