Hi, On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:53:29 -0700 (PDT) "John Meissen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Adam said: > > 2008/8/6 Robert Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I use the FvwmIconBox, so I have these lines in my .fvwmrc file: > > > > That's a pity. > [...] > It's a pity, why? Because FvwmIconBox doesn't work well? Because it's > been deprecated in favor of something better? Because you think it's > stupid? Nowadays using FvwmIconBox is considered painful, just because FvwmIconMan is way more powerful and it's also better maintained, I guess. I don't know if there's any other real downside. > > > >> as well as: > >> > >> PixmapPath /usr/X11R6/include/X11/pixmaps/ > >> IconPath /usr/X11R6/include/X11/bitmaps > > > > Both of which are wrong - you should be using ImagePath here, and even > > then those two locations are part of the default ImagePath anyway > > (c.f.: fvwm-config -I). > > If I recall, one or both of which used to be right. So are they wrong > because they're not used anymore, or because they're used for something > else and aren't appropriate? This could be easily found by just using "man fvwm". Yes, they are deprecated. Cheers. -- Jesús Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpsgDdRDhoth.pgp
Description: PGP signature
