Hi Gerard, You completely misunderstood my post. This post is not about how I'm looking at open source. It's quite simple : why did'nt you use Xyster ORM? Benjamin gave me a partial answer with the base class entity problem.
-Arié drm-4 wrote: > > Hi, > > Arié Bénichou wrote: >> Please Gerard, don't tell me what i'm supposed to do. You don't get the >> point here, the question is : why did'nt you use Xyster ORM? >> > Indeed I don't get the point. And I think that is because your reasoning > is flawed. You are basically saying we should use Xyster, because we > should not use Doctrine. Imho you should keep these two issues separate. > First: why not use Doctrine. Second: why use Xyster. > > Regarding the first, I disagree with your point that Sensiolabs is "the > competitor". If sensiolabs decides to be heavily involved in the > development of Doctrine, all the better for us (as in: users of open > source), because it is good for the continuation of the project. If > you're in any way hostile towards sensiolabs, just because they thought > of symfony, you're (imho) looking at open source the wrong way. The only > thing that really counts is licensing, because that gives us (again: > users of open source) freedom. > > Regarding the second: I'm sorry I gave you the idea that I'm telling you > what to do. Let me rephrase: you are cordially invited to write a > proposal. > > > Gerard > > -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Discontinuing-Zend-Entity-in-favour-of-Doctrine-integration-tp648011p787481.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
