if it works without the burner, all the better. my thought was that the eeprom revision might have to see the old code to install the new code, in which case a chip burner could copy the small eeprom into the large eeprom, in order to fool the flashing program.
Thomas Ainlay wrote: > > I don't see why you would need the chip burner. I am currently awaiting > parts and supplies to attempt to mod a PC 7000. I will attempt to remove > the 64K rom and replacing it with a 128K rom of the same species as used ------- -- G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
