On Apr 26, 2009, at 10:09 PM, Anne Keller-Smith wrote:

> On Apr 26, 2009, at 2:09 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>>> 1. I feel like making two separate backups, one of my whole drive  
>>> and
>>> then one of my user folder, as if I backup every couple of days and
>>> the system does something weird, wouldn't it be better to have a
>>> system to revert to?
>>>
>>
>> Absolutely
>
> I think I did not post this question properly. Should I backup the  
> whole system once and then not update that backup until the next  
> system update, and then separately backup the user files, nearly  
> every day?
>
> The reason to do this would be that if you back up the System every  
> day, would you not be backing up whatever errors have crept into  
> it, thereby rendering the backup problematic when a problem occurs?
>
> Does this make sense?
>
Your concern and question make sense.

Lets separate things a bit, Backups, Bootable systems, may or may not  
be equivalent.

If you have a 'clone' bootable system, as long as you 'boot' that  
system on a 'hardware package' with at least the minimum hardware  
NEEDED, Then you have YOUR system, as of the time of the 'clone;  
operation.

If all you have are 'backups', then you need to duplicate the  
original hardware, install the OS, and applications needed, and then  
restore your backups.

With todays costs for HD space, I can't see NOT backing up the whole  
thing.

My systems, (3-MDDs, 1 PB) all have a 55-60 GB partition on the  
internal HD. I have a couple of large Firewire HDs, partitioned with  
multiple partitions of approximately 60GB. These partitions contain  
several generations of system clones.

I use SuperDuper! -- it has a setting to 'update/clone', which will  
update a previously made clone to match today. which usually is 20  
minutes or less.(18GB of used space)
I can 'swap hardware' and be back up & running for only the 'physical  
swap & boot up' time.

The only time that I would be using a current system that was having  
problems, would be to clear out the space to restore a known good  
system, (one of the clone copies) while still being able to look at  
and retrieve data from the 'current' system.

HTH  Chuck D.
>
>
> Anne Keller Smith
> Down to Earth Web Design
>
> G4 Quicksilver 733mHz Tower
> 896 MB RAM, 40 GB hard drive, OS 10.4.11
>
> Intel iMac 2.4gHz Core 2 Duo
> 1GB RAM, 250GB Hard Drive, OS 10.5.5
>
> Intel iMac 2.66gHz Core 2 Duo
> 2GB RAM, 264GB Hard Drive, OS 10.5.6
>
> mailto:[email protected]
> http://www.downtoearthweb.com
>
>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to