On Oct 11, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
> > ---------- Original message ---------- > Subject: Re: Leopard on an upgraded QS? maybe not? > Date: Sonntag 11 Oktober 2009N > From: Kris Tilford <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > >> According to xBench & GeekBench archives, Leopard's about 20-25% >> slower than >> Tiger for PPC Macs, while counterintuitively running about 15-20% >> faster for >> Intel Macs. > > Where did you take these figures from? > > I could only find a 4% slow down for Leopard versus Tiger on a 867 > MHz G4 with > 1 GB of memory. > > http://lowendmac.com/ed/royal/09sr/leopard-vs-tiger.html > Just thought I'd report my DA Dual 533 Xbench timings which showed a 15% decrease in overall score from Tiger (35.80 / 10.4.11) to Leopard (30.53 / 10.5.8). (35.80-30.53)/35.80 * 100 = 14.7% I chose Leopard just the same, to be in better sync with my QS 2002 Dual 1GHz which is also running 10.5. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs. The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
