First, hey Peter, thanks for input! I'd seen the explicit piping before,
couldn't remember its format though; I will switch to it.
Well, after a morning of testing, I see the test system is actually finding the
repeat section variables. It looks like its error "Parameter filter_column
requires a value, but has no legal values defined" points to the fact that it
can't process any option list having <options from_data_table="[whatever table
we got]"> .
I'd assumed Planemo in its test setup would install the tool's data tables, but
now I see it is still on John's enhancement list. So I'll table those tests
until that's a go.
I guess manually setting up the data tables in galaxy won't solve that for
planemo?
*************************
I'm still stuck trying to get tool test directly in a fresh copy of Galaxy. I
edit config/tool_conf.xml.sample to have
<section id="testing" name="TESTING">
<tool file="TESTING/blast_reporting/blast_reporting.xml" />
</section>
And I run "tests.sh -id blast_reporting" (with Galaxy as owner of tool folder):
======================================================================
ERROR: Failure: ValueError (No such test TestForTool_blast_reporting)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/galaxy/production2/galaxy-dist/eggs/nose-0.11.1-py2.6.egg/nose/failure.py",
line 39, in runTest
raise self.exc_class(self.exc_val)
ValueError: No such test TestForTool_blast_reporting
Though planemo has no problem linting and testing it. Arg!
*************************
Thanks,
Damion
d.
p.s. I did mention first test works (in p1) :) .
___________________________________________________________
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
https://lists.galaxyproject.org/
To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
