NB: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice which can be viewed at http://www.sars.gov.za/Email_Disclaimer.pdf
---- Neo I apologize for my message. I feel I can cry of desperation. Neo, I didn't hurt anyone on the list. My message didn't had any spelling errors, perhaps grammatical errors. I'm a south African. My mother tongue is Afrikaans which is a foreign language, that's why I can't write perfect English. And didn't the list guidelines stipulate that on the list there is a wide variety of backgrounds which should be considered? You let me feel I'm too stupid to explain my problems on a list. Instead of jumping down and tell anyone: trek 2000 and stfc is too difficult, I'm not buying it. I'm explaining exactly where I have the problem. Are you guys still cross with me about that message I sent about james north? I realize that was totally unreasonable of me to jump down about that and I already apologized for that. And I'm saying this again, it seems to me as if my IQ is extremely low that's why I battle to understand something like degrees -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neo Sent: 25 May 2006 08:12 PM To: Gamers Discussion list Subject: Re: [Audyssey] the degree concept in trek 2000 and stc Hi Raul, let me add my two cents to this observation. I didn't want to bother at all firstly, but now, when you mentioned it yourself as a moderator, you gave me an excuse to throw a few of my words your way. *grin* I can perfectly imagine the situation. Lack of time to write everything properly and check your message before sending it out, too much lazyness to use a spell checker or common sense to eliminate your constant grammar and spelling problems, failure to look for and correct various typographical and contextual errors that were made because of little or no attention paid when writing your message. And last but not least, pretty often very little or no knowledge of the problem. These are the most common factors that make such mesages be, in my opinion. That's why I often skip a serious question. I know that I don't have enough time or knowledge to answer it properly at the moment. Sometimes, I also read through the rest of my inbox to see if someone else has already answered this better. If not, and if the question still needs an urgent answer, I just try and do my best to answer only after that. It's certainly valuable that you want to help, but please try to realize the potential confusion and misleading information of the questioner and your own inability to be a real help, and if this is the case, then better don'T reply at all than do even more damage or at least no good. Anyway, this was just my opinion and an attempt for a potential well meant hint. Sorry if it offended anyone, I just meant it as a frank and kind suggestion on what to improve. Won't overflow the list with unnecessary stuff any more. Thanks, Lukas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raul A. Gallegos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 6:33 PM Subject: Re: [Audyssey] the degree concept in trek 2000 and stc > It's messages like this which really confuse the player who is trying to > understand. This is not at all how it works. Speed does not have to do > with degrees. Further more there are only 360 degrees in a circle. 0 > degrees and 360 degrees point in the exact same direction. _______________________________________________ Gamers mailing list .. [email protected] To unsubscribe send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can visit http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org to make any subscription changes via the web. _______________________________________________ Gamers mailing list .. [email protected] To unsubscribe send E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can visit http://audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org to make any subscription changes via the web.
