Hi, I apologize for the late response to your mail but I sort of did these patches up recently .
I have a couple of patches that I submitted / intend to submit . One of them was submitted today regarding a small improvement to the auto-increment pass. I am not sure if this is suitable for stage3 if it is approved. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01060.html The other patch that we have for submission is relatively trivial and tries to be more precise with size costs for builtins while inlining. I guess that should be alright for stage3 . cheers Ramana > We are closing in on Stage 3, previously announced for September 10th. > At this point, I'm not aware of any reason to delay that date. Are > there any Stage 2 patches that people don't think will be submitted by > that point? > > Are there Stage 1 or Stage 2 patches in need of review? I'll do my best > to either (a) convince someone to review them, or (b) review them myself. > > Quality > ======= > > Priority # > -------- --- > P1 43 > P2 118 > P3 4 > Total 165 > > Obviously, that's rather more P1s than we'd like. As I mentioned in my > previous status report, of particular concern is that we've got a lot of > 4.3-only P1s. I'm sure many of those won't be too hard to fix, but we > still need to go and fix them. > > I'm concerned about getting into a situation where we say "well, 4.2 has > some bugs, but all of those are fixed in 4.3" and then realize that "oh, > well, 4.3 has different bugs too, but those are all fixed in 4.4" and so > forth. > > Previous Report > =============== > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-08/msg00181.html > > -- > Mark Mitchell > CodeSourcery > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (650) 331-3385 x713 > -- Ramana Radhakrishnan
