At 06:54 PM 1/1/01 -0800, Jonathan Eglinton wrote:
>     On to your question. Absolutely no difference. There is nothing wrong
>with crushing the heads of prey. If you have the time and it makes you feel
>better to do it, then by all means, do it. The point is simply this, there
>is no reason to do it.

I would like to respectfully disagree here.  I agree that geckos and other 
aggressive demolishers of prey are pretty safe.  However, I have personally 
lost a pair of leopard frogs to mealworm-inflicted internal injuries---we 
didn't have autopsies done, so I have only circumstantial evidence that the 
mealworms were at fault, but I found the circumstantial evidence extremely 
convincing.  (Briefly: No symptoms other than obvious physical discomfort, 
the frogs that ate of the mealworms died and the one that refused them 
didn't, and other species that ate from the same batch were fine, so I 
don't think it was a batch of poisoned worms.)

There's one other case I consider credible, from the long-ago on 
rec.pets.herp, where someone with rather high credibility---maybe Mike 
Pingleton?---reported seeing a mealworm *literally* eat its way out of one 
of his garter snakes.  I don't think the person, whoever they were, is 
around the net any more to ask for documentation, inconveniently.

I understand that the mealworm scare is blown out of proportion, and that 
many of the circumstances where it's raised are not apt.  I also agree that 
geckos, by and large, are one of the groups for whom the danger is really 
negligible.  At the same time, I get a little irritated when people dismiss 
the whole business as pure, unfounded myth.  If it were, I'd still have my 
leopard frogs.

I don't feed mealworms often, and I snip the mandibles when I do.  It's 
undoubtedly overkill, but it makes me sleep better at night.

         NT

######################################################################
                THE GLOBAL GECKO ASSOCIATION LISTSERV
                  WebSite:  http://www.gekkota.com
 The GGA takes no responsibility for the contents of these postings. 
######################################################################

Reply via email to