> Well, I am not "people" and can only speak for myself. I am all in
> favor of footprint mapping inside gschem.

I'm all in favor of keeping the mappings inside the schematic too, as
hidden attributes (migrated to pcb footprint attributes), but I see no
need to restrict *editing* them to gschem.  Like we have gattrib, some
other external program for managing inventory/purchasing/mapping may
come into existence.


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev

Reply via email to