> I was suggesting that supporting rotated pads would be easier if they > were a sub-type of polygon (or used Polygons internally - just like pin > thermals do). > > You're saying this is wrong?
Rotated *square* pads, fine. Rotated *round* pads are better classified as lines. _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
