On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:54 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > I was suggesting that supporting rotated pads would be easier if they > > were a sub-type of polygon (or used Polygons internally - just like pin > > thermals do). > > > > You're saying this is wrong? > > Rotated *square* pads, fine. Rotated *round* pads are better > classified as lines.
That is probably true - since the Polygon type doesn't support curves. Does the fix I just posted look sane to you? Seems to work given my initial testing. -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
