Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Dan McMahill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I guess I haven't found the fog to be any thicker or clearer than any >> number of programming languages. But then again, I had some Verilog-HDL >> experience prior to Verilog-A and Verilog-AMS. I won't argue that you >> currently have to spend the money though.
> Why can't some funding flow into some of the tools available to make > that -A/MS happen? > Icarus, GHDL, freehdl, ngspice and gnucap are all tools that are in > use, but none of them really support the concept of A/MS (yet) in the > Verilog/VHDL-AMS concept. Until that happens lots of money has to be > spent to be able to do "real" AMS Icarus Verilog is working on Verilog-A/MS support, but funding is always welcomed;-) There is enough support in the core compiler that someone who has gnucap and Icarus Verilog skills can start looking at integration at the code generator level. For example, there is no reason that Icarus Verilog can't be used as a Verilog-A that generates gnucap simulations. -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list geda-dev@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
