On Dec 3, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote: > > Ken Kundert knows what he is talking about
I don't think so. He thinks mixed-signal design is like computer programming. But it's not: to do it well you have to start from the *physics* of what you're trying to accomplish. I wonder what tools Paul Horowitz uses these days. *There's* a guy who understands mixed signal disign and can write clearly about it. > and he offers enough > information on http://www.designers-guide.org/index.html for anybody > interested in AMS to get up to date on the advantages of doing things > the AMS way. Kundert's book is what Al got me to buy. It's a sales pitch, not a textbook: the signal to noise ratio is very low. Someone who has a problem to solve doesn't want a bunch of hype on the advantages of a tool: they want a roadmap that will allow them to find a solution. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list geda-dev@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
