>> XL is, theoretically, that reference, although that's for IEEE1364-1995 >> and not the -2001 standard. That said, XL seems to be alone on the >> particular scheduling issue that these tests bring up, and at this >> point I doubt even Cadence cares.
Steve, I am terribly tempted to file this with Cadence as a bug - in that their two verilog simulators don't agree on these two files - just to see what their AE's say !! Would you have any objection to me sending these two files to Cadence as test cases ? Stephen.
