-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Brickles wrote: |>>XL is, theoretically, that reference, although that's for IEEE1364-1995 |>>and not the -2001 standard. That said, XL seems to be alone on the |>>particular scheduling issue that these tests bring up, and at this |>>point I doubt even Cadence cares. | | | Steve, | | I am terribly tempted to file this with Cadence as a bug - in that their | two verilog simulators don't agree on these two files - just to see what their | AE's say !! Would you have any objection to me sending these two files | to Cadence as test cases ?
Heh! By all means go for it. I'd be curious to hear what comes of it. Could be fun;-) - -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCwgDorPt1Sc2b3ikRApQ9AKDpx+iddWGqQUAzf8pIF9MWwQ4G4ACcDxwE jE/JwgHacir5GdZ414bAJ1k= =utOT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
