On 9/29/06, John Luciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/29/06, Mark Rages <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/29/06, Stefan Salewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am using newlib gEDA footprints from www.luciani.org > > ( pcb-symbols-jcl_2006-8-20.tgz). > > > > I am not sure if pin- numbering of USB-Type-B connector called > > CON_USB_TYPEB__Keystone_924 is correct. I have an identically > > looking connector from www.reichelt.de (Assmann). This connector > > is wired internally without crossing wires, which is the > > simplest way. Internal wiring of CON_USB_TYPEB__Keystone_924 is > > not shown at Keystone homepage, but I think it should be > > identical to my connctor. > > > > So I think that pin-numbers of CON_USB_TYPEB__Keystone_924 are > > wrong, V+ is exchanged with GND and D+ is exchanged with D-. > > > > Has someone used the Keystone 924 USB-Connentor and can tell me > > if my assumption about exchanged pins is right or wrong? > > > > Best regards > > > > Stefan Salewski > > > > The keystone pins and contacts are numbered: > http://www.keyelco.com/images/products/924.gif > > I think those numbers are standardized. See section 6.5 of the USB > spec or chapter 19 of USB Complete. > > I've used that footprint with a generic "B" connector and it worked OK.The pinout in that gif file (which is the as the Molex 67068) did not match my footprint. I had the rows reversed. Are you sure it was my footprint you used? Did you change the footprint? (* jcl *)
It has the same name inside it, but it is a little different. If it goes through, I've attached a screenshot showing the Keystone data, the footprint on your website ten minutes ago, and the one I used successfully. Regards, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You think that it is a secret, but it never has been one. - fortune cookie
usb.png
Description: PNG image
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
