Die Partei hat immer Recht. On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:07 AM 'Indra Azali' via GELORA45 < [email protected]> wrote:
> China has tried multiparty in the past. it does not reform for people so > election of multiparty did not work and cost to much energy and money for > media campaigned and hoax. And China use selection process from party > village to top level of 2.5 million CPC party member. Does China select > professional that are not yet Cpc member. That is part of option While > Indonesia is multiparty yet the direction of nation is based populous > religion not people center in different region. So the consolidation of > party become executive to keep changing the executive ministerial quota. > That is only between political elite for quota. > > On Monday, December 13, 2021, 08:08:49 PM GMT+7, Jaya Suprana < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > *NOT THE ONLY ONE PARTY ORIENTED ? 😁 * > > Pada tanggal Sen, 13 Des 2021 pukul 10.45 Chan CT <[email protected]> > menulis: > > *Good article sharing* > *In China, democracy is "people-oriented." * > > I am Malaysian Chinese. When my grandfather was young, he used to fight > with the horses in the forests of the Malay Peninsula, so he didn't have a > good impression of the Communist Party. In 1998, I came to China to do > mobile network. At that time, Beijing still used donkey carts to collect > wastewater. I saw farmers driving ducks on the side of the road. The fruit > vendor downstairs in the hotel asked me if I wanted a young lady. Later, > China was the same year after year. During these 23 years, I witnessed > China's development and witnessed with my own eyes what the Communist Party > did for the people. > > Many democracies are actually "you, the people, we lead." *In China, > democracy is "people-oriented."* For example, there is a 12345 hotline > in China. After the people call it, government personnel will follow this > case, and then the timing will start. For example, the roadside was very > noisy, and the soundproof fence was installed soon. Problems that cannot > be solved will be entered into the system's big data. Once the government > finds that this is a common problem, it will issue a policy to solve > similar problems all at once. The central government also judges the > performance of local governments based on big data and the efficiency of > local governments in solving problems. This is democracy, democracy that > operates every day. Is it better to give feedback to the government than > to demonstrate? > > Regardless of infrastructure, social security, people's livelihood, > environment, and greening issues, the government did it before the people > said it. No one said that high-speed rail is needed, and the high-speed > rail is here. The 300 km/h speed is still hot, the 600 km/h speed is > coming soon. Capitals like Ant Financial who want to harvest future money > are controlled by the government before the people find out. In order to > solve the pollution problem, the government heavily subsidizes tram > factories and develops trams. China is now the country with the most > trams. In the past 30 years, 25% of the trees planted globally were in > China. China is now safe, modern, convenient, colorful, free and happy. > Whether it is the new crown or a natural disaster, the Chinese government > can completely stop the economy and save people the first time. > > In a democratic country, there is an election every four to five years. > What the hell is democracy? When the election results come out, one side > is happy and the other side is sad. This result can only be said to > represent the will of a part of the people. If it is a one-sided victory, > then the result represents the will of most people, but isn't this a > one-party ruling? Because the voice of the opposition party is gone. > Quite contradictory. One-person, one-vote democracy is based on security, > but an extremely negative system is inherently inadequate. Just like a > person, afraid of car accidents, so he doesn't take a car, he prefers to > walk. They said that democracy is good because the government can be > changed, but in most cases, the soup can be changed without changing the > medicine. After the previous government project was cancelled, the new > government proposed new projects to pump oil and water. On the first day > the government was established, the country and the people were divided > into parties and divided. Some political parties also play racial issues > to gain support. With this kind of democracy, your achievements are > tantamount to my disadvantage. Therefore, the better ideas you have, the > less I oppose the party. It is best if you do nothing, and I will have a > chance next time. > > Democracy is like a couple who don’t trust each other. They find problems > with each other. They quarrel for more time than taking care of their > children. Will the children be happy? > *I personally feel that it is not logical for the opposition party to do > check and balance. It should be done by a subject without such > contradictory relations*. I have never seen other countries like China > where the people and the government have such a tacit understanding. > Everyone seems to have a kind of family-like trust. On the other hand, the > content of the chat during the meal is to scold the government, and it is > useless to scold him. Anyway, during his tenure, he is a legitimate > dictator. > > A democratic country will not make long-term plans for the people, because > he will not necessarily be in power next term. After a five-year term, > will they come up with a plan to see results in seven years? No, because > voters will say goodbye to them if they can't see the result within five > years, so they will only do something to fill in. At the time of the > election, everything is agreed, but structural issues cannot be changed > without drastic actions. In this political atmosphere, it is impossible to > make drastic measures. Therefore, after the election, the promised things > can only be ignored, and then do something about it. Kung Fu deceives the > people. The people turned there, holding back, like boiling frogs in warm > water, jumping to another pot and continuing to cook. In China, you can do > whatever you want, even the most difficult poverty problem can be solved. > China's per capita GDP is only 1/5 of that of the United States, but the > extreme poverty rate is less than 1%, compared to 12% in the United > States. It is conceivable how determined the Chinese government is. The > Chinese only look at the results. If the government does a poor job, > internal doubts and internal adjustments will arise, because if they do not > change, the situation will become serious. What awaits them is the billions > of people uprooting the government and starting anew. > > Another Achilles heel of democracy is that when campaigning, people choose > only by their impressions. Whoever puts in more propaganda and bragging > will have a better chance of being elected. For example, Trump, who has > not even managed a village before, has become president. Four years later, > serious damage has been caused. > When unidentified pneumonia appeared in the United States in July 2019, > Trump blamed the problem on e-cigarettes and covered up the problem. > China’s leadership is based on merit. And accountability is very high, and > those who make mistakes must take responsibility. > > The Chinese nation has always reached its peak in a centralized > environment, such as the Han, Tang, and Song dynasties. Only because of > centralization can peace and peace can develop. When there is more than > one force, there will be struggle, without exception, such as: Three > Kingdoms, Kuomintang-Communist Party, Warring States Period, Chu Han. > Therefore, multi-party democracy is not suitable for China and there is no > alternative. In a small place like Taiwan, multi-party struggles are most > often caused by fights in the parliament, and economic development is > slow. With a population of 1.4 billion in mainland China, the multi-party > struggle will starve many people to death. > > Many people think that a one-party system is a dictatorship. My > democratic country, Malaysia, once had a corrupt dictator Mahathir who had > been in power for 22 years. Indonesia is also democratic. Suharto has been > dictating for 30 years and embezzling for 30 years. They win every > election because they buy votes and control the media. Singapore is a > one-party leader, but it has one of the cleanest governments in the world. > Libya is the richest country in Africa under the dictatorship of Gaddafi. > After being "liberated" by NATO bombing, terrorists, refugees and black > slaves breed. The United States says it is democracy, but it is actually a > capital dictatorship. Capital has one foot on one party, and everyone > chooses it at will. The bigger the consortium, the more it likes > democracy, because the more money spent on election campaigns, the higher > the chance of winning. > > So ideology is deceptive. Deng Xiaoping realized this, gave up the pursuit > of ideology, and became pragmatic, and China has undergone earth-shaking > changes. China’s five-year plan is based on the data of this research > institute and that research institute, and is drawn up in a scientific way > and clearly written. The next five years are to complete tasks. If the > leadership team is changed, the plan will remain unchanged. Of. Is this a > dictatorship? Formulating policies based on facts and science is the best > way to combat dictatorship. > > Westerners always talk about the Chinese communist. What is the > definition of communism? "All assets are a system shared by society." Is > it like this in China now? I have a Chinese colleague who owns more than > 20 properties, a private enterprise. Since Deng Xiaoping's black cat and > white cat, China has stopped pursuing communism. The current political > system in China is: socialism + meritocracy + local democracy + Confucian > values. The economic system is: a mixed market economy (state-owned > capital + private capital). Capitalism only recognizes one thing: profit. > It does not care about social welfare. But the powerful aspect of capital > is economic power, like a powerful engine. The American system, capital > first, is like a sports car without a brake system, so there are many rich > people, and many people live under the bridge. China uses a market economy > on the basis of socialism, which not only takes care of the poor, but also > allows capital to drive the economy. It is a car with an engine, a > steering wheel, and a brake system. China refers to the ancient imperial > examination system and promotes talents. A "big talk" like Trump cannot be > a leader in China. In addition, at the village level, the people have the > right to vote. Generally speaking, the whole system follows the Confucian > culture: loving the people, loyal to the country, loyal to one's post, > filial piety to the elders, and so on. > The Chinese system has a traditional side and an adaptive side. In China, > the people cannot change the government, but the system is always > changing. In the United States, people can change governments, but the > system remains the same. If you have to give the Chinese system an > acronym, I think it should be called Whateverworkism. > > Is the Chinese system the best in the world? It can only be said that it > is most suitable for China. The Nordic system is called Social democracy. > It is more successful in implementing democracy based on socialist values > because it suits them. The liberal democracy of world powers such as the > United States, Britain, France, and India is obviously not good. > Negativity, demonstrations, strikes, large gaps between the rich and the > poor. The biggest mistake of the world is that when the country does not > advance, it still sticks to its ideology and does not want to change. It > is ridiculous that the United States also wants to impose its bad system on > other countries. I have to admire the Chinese government. Under the > pressure of the world's ideology, it still insists on taking the path that > it thinks is correct. After the Tiananmen Square incident, the Chinese > government endured the humiliation and did not refute the rumors to the > outside world and made silent efforts. After the Hong Kong riots, we > learned that Tiananmen Square was actually done by the United States, and > it really felt unfair for the Communist Party. > > In human history, the rise of powers in the past, whether it is ancient > Greece, the Roman Empire, the British Empire, the Japanese Empire, Germany, > or the U.S., was accompanied by wars, casualties, colonization, plunder, > and slavery. In 1979, China’s per capita GDP was a bit lower than India’s, > and now it is five times that of India. China’s rise is greater than that > of any empire, but China has not sent a bullet to other countries for more > than 30 years. Not only that, but China's development has also driven the > global economy. China’s success lies in its: peace-based, people’s > interests, long-term planning, scientific management, results-oriented, and > a sense of crisis. Deng Xiaoping made some people rich first, and Xi > Jinping helped the poor. After two generations of leadership, China's > policy is still so coherent. This is the effect of scientific governance > of the country. Regardless of what is said outside, the achievements of > the Communist Party are facts before our eyes. > > For most of the past two thousand years, China was the strongest and most > advanced country in the world, but in the past two hundred years because of > opium, China missed the Industrial Revolution and was forced to catch up. > The IQ per capita in China is 105, and that of Westerners is 95. China has > a large population and is hardworking, no worse than Westerners. > Westerners now account for only 14% of the global population, but they > account for 56% of the world’s wealth. So it’s not difficult to understand > that when Westerners don’t like us, it means that we are doing it right. > All Chinese children and grandchildren, come on! > > > -- > Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "GELORA45" di Google Grup. > Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, > kirim email ke [email protected]. > Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/BAE93D8B318F492988DF5A8353710CA3%40A10Live > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/BAE93D8B318F492988DF5A8353710CA3%40A10Live?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "GELORA45" di Google Grup. > Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, > kirim email ke [email protected]. > Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/CALcuTPQDc_1tepk2D2mZ_BuN%2BySidbBfGNG43kzKGocejDR8LA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/CALcuTPQDc_1tepk2D2mZ_BuN%2BySidbBfGNG43kzKGocejDR8LA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "GELORA45" di Google Grup. > Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, > kirim email ke [email protected]. > Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/1291225709.997205.1639465638965%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/1291225709.997205.1639465638965%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- Anda menerima pesan ini karena Anda berlangganan grup "GELORA45" dari Google Grup. Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim email ke [email protected]. Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/CAGjSX2Ax25pyBZ00ySZc6U72me4xGDLuOeo2BVn%3Dbg-VM3Yt9w%40mail.gmail.com.
