Apakah die Partei Immer recht?
Sent from Rogers Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue., Dec. 14, 2021 at 4:15 a.m., Sunny ambon<[email protected]>
wrote:
Die Partei hat immer Recht.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:07 AM 'Indra Azali' via GELORA45
<[email protected]> wrote:
China has tried multiparty in the past. it does not reform for people so
election of multiparty did not work and cost to much energy and money for media
campaigned and hoax. And China use selection process from party village to top
level of 2.5 million CPC party member. Does China select professional that are
not yet Cpc member. That is part of option While Indonesia is multiparty yet
the direction of nation is based populous religion not people center in
different region. So the consolidation of party become executive to keep
changing the executive ministerial quota. That is only between political elite
for quota.
On Monday, December 13, 2021, 08:08:49 PM GMT+7, Jaya Suprana
<[email protected]> wrote:
NOT THE ONLY ONE PARTY ORIENTED ? 😁
Pada tanggal Sen, 13 Des 2021 pukul 10.45 Chan CT <[email protected]>
menulis:
*Good article sharing*In China, democracy is "people-oriented." I am
Malaysian Chinese. When my grandfather was young, he used to fight with the
horses in the forests of the Malay Peninsula, so he didn't have a good
impression of the Communist Party. In 1998, I came to China to do mobile
network. At that time, Beijing still used donkey carts to collect wastewater. I
saw farmers driving ducks on the side of the road. The fruit vendor downstairs
in the hotel asked me if I wanted a young lady. Later, China was the same year
after year. During these 23 years, I witnessed China's development and
witnessed with my own eyes what the Communist Party did for the people. Many
democracies are actually "you, the people, we lead." In China, democracy is
"people-oriented." For example, there is a 12345 hotline in China. After the
people call it, government personnel will follow this case, and then the timing
will start. For example, the roadside was very noisy, and the soundproof fence
was installed soon. Problems that cannot be solved will be entered into the
system's big data. Once the government finds that this is a common problem, it
will issue a policy to solve similar problems all at once. The central
government also judges the performance of local governments based on big data
and the efficiency of local governments in solving problems. This is
democracy, democracy that operates every day. Is it better to give feedback to
the government than to demonstrate? Regardless of infrastructure, social
security, people's livelihood, environment, and greening issues, the government
did it before the people said it. No one said that high-speed rail is needed,
and the high-speed rail is here. The 300 km/h speed is still hot, the 600 km/h
speed is coming soon. Capitals like Ant Financial who want to harvest future
money are controlled by the government before the people find out. In order to
solve the pollution problem, the government heavily subsidizes tram factories
and develops trams. China is now the country with the most trams. In the past
30 years, 25% of the trees planted globally were in China. China is now safe,
modern, convenient, colorful, free and happy. Whether it is the new crown or a
natural disaster, the Chinese government can completely stop the economy and
save people the first time. In a democratic country, there is an election every
four to five years. What the hell is democracy? When the election results come
out, one side is happy and the other side is sad. This result can only be said
to represent the will of a part of the people. If it is a one-sided victory,
then the result represents the will of most people, but isn't this a one-party
ruling? Because the voice of the opposition party is gone. Quite
contradictory. One-person, one-vote democracy is based on security, but an
extremely negative system is inherently inadequate. Just like a person, afraid
of car accidents, so he doesn't take a car, he prefers to walk. They said that
democracy is good because the government can be changed, but in most cases, the
soup can be changed without changing the medicine. After the previous
government project was cancelled, the new government proposed new projects to
pump oil and water. On the first day the government was established, the
country and the people were divided into parties and divided. Some political
parties also play racial issues to gain support. With this kind of democracy,
your achievements are tantamount to my disadvantage. Therefore, the better
ideas you have, the less I oppose the party. It is best if you do nothing, and
I will have a chance next time. Democracy is like a couple who don’t trust each
other. They find problems with each other. They quarrel for more time than
taking care of their children. Will the children be happy?*I personally feel
that it is not logical for the opposition party to do check and balance. It
should be done by a subject without such contradictory relations*. I have
never seen other countries like China where the people and the government have
such a tacit understanding. Everyone seems to have a kind of family-like
trust. On the other hand, the content of the chat during the meal is to scold
the government, and it is useless to scold him. Anyway, during his tenure, he
is a legitimate dictator. A democratic country will not make long-term plans
for the people, because he will not necessarily be in power next term. After a
five-year term, will they come up with a plan to see results in seven years?
No, because voters will say goodbye to them if they can't see the result within
five years, so they will only do something to fill in. At the time of the
election, everything is agreed, but structural issues cannot be changed without
drastic actions. In this political atmosphere, it is impossible to make drastic
measures. Therefore, after the election, the promised things can only be
ignored, and then do something about it. Kung Fu deceives the people. The
people turned there, holding back, like boiling frogs in warm water, jumping to
another pot and continuing to cook. In China, you can do whatever you want,
even the most difficult poverty problem can be solved. China's per capita GDP
is only 1/5 of that of the United States, but the extreme poverty rate is less
than 1%, compared to 12% in the United States. It is conceivable how
determined the Chinese government is. The Chinese only look at the results. If
the government does a poor job, internal doubts and internal adjustments will
arise, because if they do not change, the situation will become serious. What
awaits them is the billions of people uprooting the government and starting
anew. Another Achilles heel of democracy is that when campaigning, people
choose only by their impressions. Whoever puts in more propaganda and bragging
will have a better chance of being elected. For example, Trump, who has not
even managed a village before, has become president. Four years later, serious
damage has been caused.When unidentified pneumonia appeared in the United
States in July 2019, Trump blamed the problem on e-cigarettes and covered up
the problem. China’s leadership is based on merit. And accountability is very
high, and those who make mistakes must take responsibility. The Chinese nation
has always reached its peak in a centralized environment, such as the Han,
Tang, and Song dynasties. Only because of centralization can peace and peace
can develop. When there is more than one force, there will be struggle,
without exception, such as: Three Kingdoms, Kuomintang-Communist Party, Warring
States Period, Chu Han. Therefore, multi-party democracy is not suitable for
China and there is no alternative. In a small place like Taiwan, multi-party
struggles are most often caused by fights in the parliament, and economic
development is slow. With a population of 1.4 billion in mainland China, the
multi-party struggle will starve many people to death. Many people think that a
one-party system is a dictatorship. My democratic country, Malaysia, once had
a corrupt dictator Mahathir who had been in power for 22 years. Indonesia is
also democratic. Suharto has been dictating for 30 years and embezzling for 30
years. They win every election because they buy votes and control the media.
Singapore is a one-party leader, but it has one of the cleanest governments in
the world. Libya is the richest country in Africa under the dictatorship of
Gaddafi. After being "liberated" by NATO bombing, terrorists, refugees and
black slaves breed. The United States says it is democracy, but it is actually
a capital dictatorship. Capital has one foot on one party, and everyone chooses
it at will. The bigger the consortium, the more it likes democracy, because
the more money spent on election campaigns, the higher the chance of winning.
So ideology is deceptive. Deng Xiaoping realized this, gave up the pursuit of
ideology, and became pragmatic, and China has undergone earth-shaking changes.
China’s five-year plan is based on the data of this research institute and that
research institute, and is drawn up in a scientific way and clearly written.
The next five years are to complete tasks. If the leadership team is changed,
the plan will remain unchanged. Of. Is this a dictatorship? Formulating
policies based on facts and science is the best way to combat dictatorship.
Westerners always talk about the Chinese communist. What is the definition of
communism? "All assets are a system shared by society." Is it like this in
China now? I have a Chinese colleague who owns more than 20 properties, a
private enterprise. Since Deng Xiaoping's black cat and white cat, China has
stopped pursuing communism. The current political system in China is:
socialism + meritocracy + local democracy + Confucian values. The economic
system is: a mixed market economy (state-owned capital + private capital).
Capitalism only recognizes one thing: profit. It does not care about social
welfare. But the powerful aspect of capital is economic power, like a powerful
engine. The American system, capital first, is like a sports car without a
brake system, so there are many rich people, and many people live under the
bridge. China uses a market economy on the basis of socialism, which not only
takes care of the poor, but also allows capital to drive the economy. It is a
car with an engine, a steering wheel, and a brake system. China refers to the
ancient imperial examination system and promotes talents. A "big talk" like
Trump cannot be a leader in China. In addition, at the village level, the
people have the right to vote. Generally speaking, the whole system follows
the Confucian culture: loving the people, loyal to the country, loyal to one's
post, filial piety to the elders, and so on.The Chinese system has a
traditional side and an adaptive side. In China, the people cannot change the
government, but the system is always changing. In the United States, people
can change governments, but the system remains the same. If you have to give
the Chinese system an acronym, I think it should be called Whateverworkism. Is
the Chinese system the best in the world? It can only be said that it is most
suitable for China. The Nordic system is called Social democracy. It is more
successful in implementing democracy based on socialist values because it
suits them. The liberal democracy of world powers such as the United States,
Britain, France, and India is obviously not good. Negativity, demonstrations,
strikes, large gaps between the rich and the poor. The biggest mistake of the
world is that when the country does not advance, it still sticks to its
ideology and does not want to change. It is ridiculous that the United States
also wants to impose its bad system on other countries. I have to admire the
Chinese government. Under the pressure of the world's ideology, it still
insists on taking the path that it thinks is correct. After the Tiananmen
Square incident, the Chinese government endured the humiliation and did not
refute the rumors to the outside world and made silent efforts. After the Hong
Kong riots, we learned that Tiananmen Square was actually done by the United
States, and it really felt unfair for the Communist Party. In human history,
the rise of powers in the past, whether it is ancient Greece, the Roman Empire,
the British Empire, the Japanese Empire, Germany, or the U.S., was accompanied
by wars, casualties, colonization, plunder, and slavery. In 1979, China’s per
capita GDP was a bit lower than India’s, and now it is five times that of
India. China’s rise is greater than that of any empire, but China has not sent
a bullet to other countries for more than 30 years. Not only that, but China's
development has also driven the global economy. China’s success lies in its:
peace-based, people’s interests, long-term planning, scientific management,
results-oriented, and a sense of crisis. Deng Xiaoping made some people rich
first, and Xi Jinping helped the poor. After two generations of leadership,
China's policy is still so coherent. This is the effect of scientific
governance of the country. Regardless of what is said outside, the
achievements of the Communist Party are facts before our eyes. For most of the
past two thousand years, China was the strongest and most advanced country in
the world, but in the past two hundred years because of opium, China missed the
Industrial Revolution and was forced to catch up. The IQ per capita in China
is 105, and that of Westerners is 95. China has a large population and is
hardworking, no worse than Westerners. Westerners now account for only 14% of
the global population, but they account for 56% of the world’s wealth. So it’s
not difficult to understand that when Westerners don’t like us, it means that
we are doing it right. All Chinese children and grandchildren, come on!
--
Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "GELORA45" di Google Grup.
Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim
email ke [email protected].
Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/BAE93D8B318F492988DF5A8353710CA3%40A10Live.
--
Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "GELORA45" di Google Grup.
Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim
email ke [email protected].
Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/CALcuTPQDc_1tepk2D2mZ_BuN%2BySidbBfGNG43kzKGocejDR8LA%40mail.gmail.com.
--
Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "GELORA45" di Google Grup.
Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim
email ke [email protected].
Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/1291225709.997205.1639465638965%40mail.yahoo.com.
--
Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "GELORA45" di Google Grup.
Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim
email ke [email protected].
Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/CAGjSX2Ax25pyBZ00ySZc6U72me4xGDLuOeo2BVn%3Dbg-VM3Yt9w%40mail.gmail.com.
--
Anda menerima pesan ini karena Anda berlangganan grup "GELORA45" dari Google
Grup.
Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim
email ke [email protected].
Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/1626968126.966783.1639523476542%40mail.yahoo.com.
