----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/759/#review1394 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/arch/x86/utility.cc <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/759/#comment1833> This is not true. They are consistent among themselves, and there -happen- to not be any side effects that need to go along for the ride. If, for instance, the debug registers were set such that there was a hardware breakpoint somewhere, those would have to be set in such a way that the hardware breakpoint was installed in the new system as well, and that any existing breakpoint from it's own registers was removed. Future changes to what the miscregs do and how they work could definitely break this assumption without introducing any inconsistencies. - Gabe On 2011-07-07 07:59:18, Nilay Vaish wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/759/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-07-07 07:59:18) > > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > > > Summary > ------- > > x86: Implements copyRegs() function > The copyRegs() function for x86 is currently unimplemented. This patch > provides an implementation. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/arch/x86/utility.cc fad37c6670a6 > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/759/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Nilay > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
