-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1606/#review3847
-----------------------------------------------------------



configs/common/Options.py
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1606/#comment3709>

    Why do we need this separately? Why not just add the list of configurations 
to help text for cpu-type?


- Nilay Vaish


On Jan. 7, 2013, 11:30 a.m., Ali Saidi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1606/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 7, 2013, 11:30 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9455:969ab2ed5cfa
> ---------------------------
> config: Cleanup CPU configuration
> 
> The CPUs supported by the configuration scripts used to be
> hard-coded. This was not ideal for several reasons. For example, the
> configuration scripts depend on all CPU models even though only a
> subset might have been compiled.
> 
> This changeset adds a new module to the configuration scripts that
> automatically discovers the available CPU models from the compiled
> SimObjects. As a nice bonus, the use of introspection allows us to
> automatically generate a list of available CPU models suitable for
> printing. This list is augmented with the Python doc string from the
> underlying class if available.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/common/CpuConfig.py PRE-CREATION 
>   configs/common/Options.py 56610ab73040 
>   configs/common/Simulation.py 56610ab73040 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1606/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ali Saidi
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to