----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1606/#review3851 -----------------------------------------------------------
configs/common/CpuConfig.py <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1606/#comment3713> Yes and no. It could be, but in that case if you old compiled in the simple CPUs you'd get an error instead of you need to have compiled the InOrderCPU... configs/common/Options.py <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1606/#comment3712> that are available (and compiled in), yes - Ali Saidi On Jan. 7, 2013, 11:30 a.m., Ali Saidi wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1606/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 7, 2013, 11:30 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 9455:969ab2ed5cfa > --------------------------- > config: Cleanup CPU configuration > > The CPUs supported by the configuration scripts used to be > hard-coded. This was not ideal for several reasons. For example, the > configuration scripts depend on all CPU models even though only a > subset might have been compiled. > > This changeset adds a new module to the configuration scripts that > automatically discovers the available CPU models from the compiled > SimObjects. As a nice bonus, the use of introspection allows us to > automatically generate a list of available CPU models suitable for > printing. This list is augmented with the Python doc string from the > underlying class if available. > > > Diffs > ----- > > configs/common/CpuConfig.py PRE-CREATION > configs/common/Options.py 56610ab73040 > configs/common/Simulation.py 56610ab73040 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1606/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Ali Saidi > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
