Hi Nilay, I'm afraid I won't have time to do that until next week sometime.
In the meanwhile I have re-verified that the regressions are indeed getting 19% slower (by disabling your patch again). ~13hr with and ~11hr without. Andreas On 24/09/2013 15:25, "Nilay Vaish" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Andreas Hansson wrote: > >> >> >> >> And the third point is withing 1% of the last two ones, and again it is >>19% slower. I'll remove your patch again and report back on the change >>tomorrow. >> > >Andreas, can you time the tests that switch cpus repeatedly separately? I >ran one se (30.eon) and one fs (x86 pc-o3-timing) test and did not find >much difference. I want to test the hypothesis that a major slowdown has >occurred in those switch cpu tests. > >Thanks >Nilay > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
