-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2148/#review4868
-----------------------------------------------------------



configs/common/FSConfig.py
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2148/#comment4545>

    I'm not a massive fan of this implicit splitting. Is there no sensible way 
we can make this more explicit, for example by forcing the user to specify a 
(comma-separated) list of sizes?



configs/common/FSConfig.py
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2148/#comment4546>

    Implicit assumptions here as well that would be good to avoid.


- Andreas Hansson


On Jan. 18, 2014, 2:38 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2148/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 18, 2014, 2:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10015:ad6b02503cc7
> ---------------------------
> config: allow more than 3GB of memory for x86 simulations
> This patch edits the configuration files so that x86 simulations can have
> more than 3GB of memory.  It also corrects a bug in the MemConfig.py script.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/common/FSConfig.py a362694dda2d 
>   configs/common/MemConfig.py a362694dda2d 
>   configs/example/fs.py a362694dda2d 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2148/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nilay Vaish
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to