-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2148/#review4875
-----------------------------------------------------------


It looks much better with the comments.

One potential concern is that we consider each memory range as a separate 
multi-channel DRAM controller. Hence, when we split 4 GB into 3 GB + 1 GB, we 
now create a (potentially multi-channel) controller per range. If the user says 
4 channel DDR3, we now have 8 channels of DDR3.

I don't know what is sensible to do here, but perhaps this solutions needs to 
be a bit more elaborate, and involve an AddrMapper one way or another?

- Andreas Hansson


On Jan. 20, 2014, 7:43 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2148/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 20, 2014, 7:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10015:f67896fae8ec
> ---------------------------
> config: allow more than 3GB of memory for x86 simulations
> This patch edits the configuration files so that x86 simulations can have
> more than 3GB of memory.  It also corrects a bug in the MemConfig.py script.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/common/FSConfig.py a362694dda2d 
>   configs/common/MemConfig.py a362694dda2d 
>   configs/example/fs.py a362694dda2d 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2148/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nilay Vaish
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to