Hi Nilay, I??d rather phrase it as: What needs to be done to support multiple (non-contiguous) memory ranges? Your patch solves part of the problem, and also exposes the need for some further changes. I??m merely keen to pin point what needs to be done, and then divvy up the work one way or another.
Thanks, Andreas On 22/01/2014 11:35, "Nilay Vaish" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Andreas Hansson wrote: > >> Hi Nilay, >> >> I??m not really sure what you are suggesting. How could MemConfig solve >> this? My gut feeling is that the AbstractMemory (and all classes >> inheriting from it) needs to support multiple ranges. >> >> If we ignore the KVM CPU then the AddrMapper would suffice. >> > >Is it a shorcoming of this patch that twice the number of controllers >would get generated? > > >-- >Nilay -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
