----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3183/#review7426 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/mem/packet_queue.cc (line 117) <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3183/#comment6266> That is 64 kB of implicit storage! As I've already mentioned many times, this check has been instrumental in finding lots of problems in the memory system, and I am against changing it. I think the best option here is a compile-time switch for disabling this sanity check. Perhaps we can call it "ludicrous mode" :-) If you want to set that from Ruby and remove the safety net that's fine. - Andreas Hansson On Oct. 30, 2015, 9:52 p.m., Tony Gutierrez wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3183/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 30, 2015, 9:52 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 11189:d89321a4dac4 > --------------------------- > mem: increase arbitrary limit on the packet queue > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/packet_queue.cc 4daf60db14d794e2344a6c86a93bdd8273bc5bb6 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3183/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Tony Gutierrez > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
