Okay, thank you. I have received your suggestion and I will think it over
tomorrow. It's already midnight here, so I'll go to bed first ?9?6?? Thank you
again. By the way, it seems that every time I send you an email, you always
reject it.
------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????: "The gem5 Users mailing list"<gem5-users@gem5.org>;
????????: 2023??4??21??(??????) ????0:10
??????: "The gem5 Users mailing list"<gem5-users@gem5.org>;
????: "????????????????"<upczhangt...@qq.com>; "Eliot
Moss"<m...@cs.umass.edu>;
????: [gem5-users] Re: ??????gem5&&instruction execute&&ALU
On 4/20/2023 11:56 AM, ???????????????? via gem5-users wrote:
> Thank you for your reply again, hahahaha. I have been thinking recently
whether it is possible to
> design ALU through Verilog, translate it through Verilator or other tools,
and ultimately use it in
> Gem5. I'm not sure if it's feasible. I am so obsessed with ALU because I
need to provide a rough
> reproduction of an article that uses the Residual Number System (RNS) to
design a CPU core. Since I
> first learned about Gem5, I wanted to keep working on this tool. But now
it doesn't seem very good.
As far as gem5 is concerned, you could just write the
operations in C++. Though if the overall result is the
same as regular binary arithmetic, there is little point.
gem5 simply does not model at that level. What would you
be showing?
If you want to be modeling things at that level, maybe
building up a CPU using an FPGA board is for you.
Best wishes - EM
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
