Hi Meral,
many thanks for the review, more inline:
On 10/10/2013 03:26 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2013-10-10
IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-10
IESG Telechat date: NA
Summary:
This draft is ready to be published as Informational RFC but I do have
some editorial comments.
Nits/editorial comments:
-[Page 4], is there a reason to use both "seq_num field" and
"sequence_number field" ?
looking at RFC 6655 suggests that the latter should be changed to match
the former.
-[Page 7], Section 7, Zigbee Smart Energy 2.0 working group, a
reference would be useful since it is not an IETF WG.
That is a good idea. I've copied Robert Cragie, who should be able to
suggest a good reference.
David
Best Regards,
Meral
---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson
Research
www.ericsson.com
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
