Hi Robert, Yes I saw that and replied to this older one by mistake. Thank you for the re-correction.
Best, Meral From: Robert Cragie [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 2:41 PM To: Meral Shirazipour Cc: David McGrew; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07 I did send an e-mail - there is a mistake below. The suggested reference should be: [SEP2] ZigBee Alliance, Inc. and HomePlug Powerline Alliance, Inc., "Smart Energy Profile 2 Application Protocol Standard", ZigBee Public Document 13-0200-00, 2013. Please make sure this is used, not the one below. Thank you Robert On 13/10/2013 05:28, Meral Shirazipour wrote: Hi, Thank you, that will be great. Best, Meral From: Robert Cragie [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 2:02 PM To: Meral Shirazipour Cc: David McGrew; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07 The suggested reference is: [SEP2] ZigBee Alliance, Inc. and HomePlug Powerline Alliance, Inc., "Smart Energy Profile 2 9 Application Protocol Standard", ZigBee Public Document 13-0200-00, 2013. Then perhaps reword: "This draft is motivated by the considerations raised in the Zigbee Smart Energy 2.0 working group" to something like: "This draft is motivated by the considerations raised in the Zigbee Smart Energy 2.0 working group and specified in [SEP2]" Robert On 10/10/2013 16:32, Meral Shirazipour wrote: Hi, Thank you David. Best Regards, Meral From: David McGrew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:10 AM To: Meral Shirazipour Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07 Hi Meral, many thanks for the review, more inline: On 10/10/2013 03:26 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2013-10-10 IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-10 IESG Telechat date: NA Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Informational RFC but I do have some editorial comments. Nits/editorial comments: -[Page 4], is there a reason to use both "seq_num field" and "sequence_number field" ? looking at RFC 6655 suggests that the latter should be changed to match the former. -[Page 7], Section 7, Zigbee Smart Energy 2.0 working group, a reference would be useful since it is not an IETF WG. That is a good idea. I've copied Robert Cragie, who should be able to suggest a good reference. David Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com<http://www.ericsson.com>
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
