Hopefully things will go so smoothly :)
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jari Arkko <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the review, Suresh! Magnus & Richard: the document is up for > the IESG telechat on Thursday, and currently there are no Discusses. Make > sure we're doing Approved::Revised ID Needed, in case there are no other > reasons to revise the document (and you believe changes are needed). > > Jari > > On Dec 17, 2013, at 2:25 AM, Magnus Westerlund < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks Suresh, > > > > We will take your comment into account when we do the next revision. > > > > Cheers > > > > Magnus > > > > On 2013-12-17 06:23, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > >> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer > >> for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > >> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > >> > >> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before > >> posting a new version of the draft. > >> > >> Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-09.txt > >> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan > >> Review Date: 2013/12/16 > >> IESG Telechat date: 2013/12/19 > >> > >> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but > >> I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. > >> > >> Minor > >> ===== > >> > >> * Section 1 > >> > >> This sentence is a bit awkward > >> > >> The IETF considers it important that protocols implement, and makes > >> available to the user, secure modes of operation > >> > >> Suggest rewording to something like > >> > >> The IETF considers it important that protocols implement secure modes of > >> operation and make them available to users. > >> > >> * Section 2.1 > >> > >> I am not sure what this statement means. Can you please clarify? > >> > >> "Here the combination of the security protocol protecting the RTP > >> session and its RTP and RTCP traffic and the key-management protocol > >> becomes important in which security statements one can do." > >> > >> * Section 4.1.4 > >> > >> s/will be more relevant then/will be more relevant than/ > >> > >> This sentence is hard to read. Please consider rewording > >> > >> "Commonly by provisioning the verifier with the public part of a root > >> certificate, this enables the verifier to verify a trust chain from the > >> root certificate down to the identity certificate." > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> Suresh > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Magnus Westerlund > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > > Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gen-art mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
