Hi, Thanks, I incorporated changes to address these. For Section 2.1, I changed “protecting the RTP session and its RTP and RTCP traffic and the key-management protocol becomes important in which security statements one can do” to “protecting the RTP session (and hence the RTP and RTCP traffic) and the key-management protocol becomes important to determine what security claims can be made”. Hopefully this is clearer.
Cheers, Colin On 17 Dec 2013, at 07:25, Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Suresh, > > We will take your comment into account when we do the next revision. > > Cheers > > Magnus > > On 2013-12-17 06:23, Suresh Krishnan wrote: >> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer >> for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see >> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). >> >> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before >> posting a new version of the draft. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-09.txt >> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan >> Review Date: 2013/12/16 >> IESG Telechat date: 2013/12/19 >> >> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but >> I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. >> >> Minor >> ===== >> >> * Section 1 >> >> This sentence is a bit awkward >> >> The IETF considers it important that protocols implement, and makes >> available to the user, secure modes of operation >> >> Suggest rewording to something like >> >> The IETF considers it important that protocols implement secure modes of >> operation and make them available to users. >> >> * Section 2.1 >> >> I am not sure what this statement means. Can you please clarify? >> >> "Here the combination of the security protocol protecting the RTP >> session and its RTP and RTCP traffic and the key-management protocol >> becomes important in which security statements one can do." >> >> * Section 4.1.4 >> >> s/will be more relevant then/will be more relevant than/ >> >> This sentence is hard to read. Please consider rewording >> >> "Commonly by provisioning the verifier with the public part of a root >> certificate, this enables the verifier to verify a trust chain from the >> root certificate down to the identity certificate." >> >> >> Thanks >> Suresh >> >> > > > -- > > Magnus Westerlund > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Colin Perkins http://csperkins.org/ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
