On 2014-01-15 00:19, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi Colin, > Thanks for making the changes. I will look at the next rev when you > publish it.
Thanks, I will submit the revision now. Cheers Magnus > > Thanks > Suresh > > On 01/12/2014 02:33 PM, Colin Perkins wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks, I incorporated changes to address these. For Section 2.1, I >> changed “protecting the RTP session and its RTP and RTCP traffic and >> the key-management protocol becomes important in which security >> statements one can do” to “protecting the RTP session (and hence the >> RTP and RTCP traffic) and the key-management protocol becomes >> important to determine what security claims can be made”. Hopefully >> this is clearer. >> >> Cheers, >> Colin >> >> >> On 17 Dec 2013, at 07:25, Magnus Westerlund >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Thanks Suresh, >>> >>> We will take your comment into account when we do the next revision. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Magnus >>> >>> On 2013-12-17 06:23, Suresh Krishnan wrote: >>>> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer >>>> for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see >>>> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). >>>> >>>> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before >>>> posting a new version of the draft. >>>> >>>> Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-09.txt >>>> Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan >>>> Review Date: 2013/12/16 >>>> IESG Telechat date: 2013/12/19 >>>> >>>> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC >>>> but >>>> I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. >>>> >>>> Minor >>>> ===== >>>> >>>> * Section 1 >>>> >>>> This sentence is a bit awkward >>>> >>>> The IETF considers it important that protocols implement, and makes >>>> available to the user, secure modes of operation >>>> >>>> Suggest rewording to something like >>>> >>>> The IETF considers it important that protocols implement secure >>>> modes of >>>> operation and make them available to users. >>>> >>>> * Section 2.1 >>>> >>>> I am not sure what this statement means. Can you please clarify? >>>> >>>> "Here the combination of the security protocol protecting the RTP >>>> session and its RTP and RTCP traffic and the key-management protocol >>>> becomes important in which security statements one can do." >>>> >>>> * Section 4.1.4 >>>> >>>> s/will be more relevant then/will be more relevant than/ >>>> >>>> This sentence is hard to read. Please consider rewording >>>> >>>> "Commonly by provisioning the verifier with the public part of a root >>>> certificate, this enables the verifier to verify a trust chain from the >>>> root certificate down to the identity certificate." >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Suresh >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Magnus Westerlund >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 >>> Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 >>> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected] >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> > -- Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
