Excuse me, Beria, but I agree that your tone is, in fact,
highly inappropriate.

From,
Emily


On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Béria Lima <beria.l...@wikimedia.pt> wrote:

> Sarah, until i tell you to "fuck off" I'm being respectful to you.
> Actually the simple meaning of taking time in my volunteer, no paid work as
> a wikimedian to answer your mail show I respect you.
>
> To your idea: Ever heard of OTRS system? I'm sure with all your "work" for
> GLAM you already did, so if you have some image you want in commons ask
> them to release in a compatible license.
>
> HIRE someone to take pictures for us is a very idiotic idea, with the full
> amount of great photographers who take pictures for free to upload on
> commons, even more, hire the models as well can almost qualify as the most
> idiot idea ever.
>
> I do believe in volunteer work Sarah, which is the basis of our wiki way.
> Try to get something by paying people to do where you simply don't know if
> can be done by volunteers - since no one ever asked - is, in my humble
> opinion, stupid.
> _____
> *Béria Lima*
>
> *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
> livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
> construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>*
>
>
> On 6 May 2012 14:24, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  On 5/6/12 1:20 PM, Béria Lima wrote:
>>
>> Good idea Sarah. Prove everyone in the world we don't even have enough
>> woman in the 9% of editors who can take a picture of some "trivial" thing.
>> Prove the world the only way to have picture of girls in commons is hiring
>> models and photographers to take them.
>>
>> I have NO idea why no one thought of this before!
>>
>>
>> Beria, I'd appreciate a more respectful tone. As always, with me, and
>> anyone else on this list. The snarkiness of your comment isn't one to make
>> me want to participate or share my brainstorms or ideas on this list.
>>
>> Just because you disagree with my idea, doesn't mean others might find
>> value in it, and it might improve content. Not every woman wants to edit
>> Wikipedia and I have met women who are photographers who have expressed
>> interest in uploading photographs and also women who would rather
>> participate as volunteers to be photographed. Using the term model does not
>> necessarily mean traditional "model body types" of women. Anyone can be a
>> model if you put them in front of a camera.
>>
>> Again, please be a bit more polite in your responses on this list. I know
>> I'm not the only person who would appreciate that. Thank you,
>>
>> -Sarah
>>
>>
>>
>> _____
>> *Béria Lima*
>>
>> *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
>> livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
>> construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>*
>>
>>
>> On 6 May 2012 14:13, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  On 5/6/12 1:07 PM, Carol Moore DC wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/2/2012 9:39 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Don't miss http://thehairpin.com/2011/01/women-laughing-alone-with-salad
>>>
>>>
>>>  Where are women laughing as they chop up bloody sausage...
>>>
>>> To me I guess I see hostility and dominance in the kind of shots people
>>> have been complaining about.  I don't think women should respond en masse
>>> with the same, but if no one responds at all, I feel it is my duty to
>>> mention bloody sausages.
>>>
>>> Of course, women have responded here, but I guess not enough of a ping
>>> in the fabric of world wide male dominance for me to keep my bloody
>>> sausages to my self...
>>>
>>> Hmmm... maybe I should write some of my favorite artists with
>>> suggestions....
>>>
>>> Or get rich and commission a bunch of stuff I like... whatever the
>>> them...
>>>
>>> (Handsome male dogs of various breeds on their backs smiling and saying
>>> "Scratch my belly mommy.")
>>>
>>>
>>>  There was an idea brainstormed a little while back with me and a few
>>> other folks about seeking funding to have a "Wiki Loves Women" photography
>>> event that wanted photographers to take photographs of women - and this
>>> wouldn't be some broad crowdsourced thing like WLM, we would work with
>>> photographers, various "models" etc and make this legit with releases, etc
>>> - doing whatever we needed them to be better represented doing, so to say.
>>> So, wearing certain articles of clothing (i.e. "go go boots"), certain make
>>> up looks or uses, hairstyles, - places that are often poorly represented
>>> regarding "women's stuff" (i.e. men don't get manicures that often, sorry)
>>> even as extreme as sex acts, I also wanted to just have women doing
>>> "things" like mowing the lawn and planting flowers or pan searing salmon or
>>> whatever things need videos to represent them (and no, these women wouldn't
>>> be nude :P). The latter was inspired by Jenny Geigel Mikulay's work at
>>> Alverno College where she had her students (it's a women's college) make
>>> films of things like playing drums, the art museum building kinetic
>>> architecture time-lapsed, etc. All of these videos have been uploaded to
>>> Commons.
>>>
>>> Someday I'll do it =) I can see it being a project that would be a
>>> perfect fit for Kickstarter.
>>>
>>> Sarah
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Sarah Stierch*
>>> *Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow*
>>> >>Mind the gap! Support Wikipedia women's outreach: donate 
>>> >>today<https://donate.wikimedia.org/>
>>> <<
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing 
>> listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Sarah Stierch*
>> *Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow*
>> >>Mind the gap! Support Wikipedia women's outreach: donate 
>> >>today<https://donate.wikimedia.org/>
>> <<
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to