> --- Neal Stuntz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yes yes yes. freebsd is easier to figure out, and for some odd > > reason it > > works on the first go around.
That would be with compatible hardware ofcourse. > >Yeah you do have to know how to > > configure > > some bootup files, login files, etc.. to get sound working, and > > others. > > I donno, the day a linux kernel can compiled, and booted in under > > 1 > > min, i'll give it a shot again. ( yes you CAN compile/boot > > freebsd's > > kerenel in under a min, we just did it in 59.4 seconds. AMD dual > > AMD > > 2000MP ) > > > > neal No sure how important this is. I am not familiar with BSD but I did try to install it once, the set up is somewhat similar to Slackware but that is all I know. Well, it did work just fine but I could not get X going. Anyway, why is it important to have a faster compile time? If you ask me, all that really means is that there is less error checking, dependency etc; therefore, eventually with catch on. take care, Al
