--------------040908090906050800020009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
heh, it's called useless, unimportant, non-meaningful bragging, to prove a useless point, that is only based on my own opinion. neal :) Alvaro Zuniga wrote: >>--- Neal Stuntz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>yes yes yes. freebsd is easier to figure out, and for some odd >>>reason it >>>works on the first go around. >>> >>> > >That would be with compatible hardware ofcourse. > > > >>>Yeah you do have to know how to >>>configure >>>some bootup files, login files, etc.. to get sound working, and >>>others. >>> I donno, the day a linux kernel can compiled, and booted in under >>>1 >>>min, i'll give it a shot again. ( yes you CAN compile/boot >>>freebsd's >>>kerenel in under a min, we just did it in 59.4 seconds. AMD dual >>>AMD >>>2000MP ) >>> >>>neal >>> >>> > >No sure how important this is. I am not familiar with BSD but I did try >to install it once, the set up is somewhat similar to Slackware but that >is all I know. Well, it did work just fine but I could not get X going. >Anyway, why is it important to have a faster compile time? If you ask >me, all that really means is that there is less error checking, >dependency etc; therefore, eventually with catch on. > >take care, > >Al > > >_______________________________________________ >General mailing list >[email protected] >http://host19.nocdirect.com/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > > --------------040908090906050800020009 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> heh, it's called useless, unimportant, non-meaningful bragging, to prove a useless point, that is only based on my own opinion.<br> <br> neal :)<br> <br> Alvaro Zuniga wrote:<br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">--- Neal Stuntz <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"><[EMAIL PROTECTED]></a> wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">yes yes yes. freebsd is easier to figure out, and for some odd reason it works on the first go around. </pre> </blockquote> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> That would be with compatible hardware ofcourse. </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Yeah you do have to know how to configure some bootup files, login files, etc.. to get sound working, and others. I donno, the day a linux kernel can compiled, and booted in under 1 min, i'll give it a shot again. ( yes you CAN compile/boot freebsd's kerenel in under a min, we just did it in 59.4 seconds. AMD dual AMD 2000MP ) neal </pre> </blockquote> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> No sure how important this is. I am not familiar with BSD but I did try to install it once, the set up is somewhat similar to Slackware but that is all I know. Well, it did work just fine but I could not get X going. Anyway, why is it important to have a faster compile time? If you ask me, all that really means is that there is less error checking, dependency etc; therefore, eventually with catch on. take care, Al _______________________________________________ General mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://host19.nocdirect.com/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net";>http://host19.nocdirect.com/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net</a> </pre> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html> --------------040908090906050800020009--
