This is just silly:
Linux backers have reacted angrily, stating that SCO hasn't
identified any offending parts of the software. SCO says doing that
would let programmers change the software to hide evidence of copying.
"That's like saying, 'show us the fingerprints on the gun so you can rub
them off,' " Mr. McBride says.
Unless I am mistaken these programmers would have to find all of the source
code for all past releases, delete it, and hope nobody else had a copy.
Yeah, that could happen. :)
At 10:23 AM 5/19/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Figures... MS is going to buy a license from SCO and help their campaign....
>
>http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB105329732841072600-H9jeoNmlaJ2oZymbXqHbK6Im4,00.html
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>General mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
---
Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Puryear Information Technology
Windows, UNIX, and IT Consulting
http://www.puryear-it.com
