So in short, SCO's postion is the equivalent of:
"I bought a Gutenberg Bible therefore I own God"?
... I wouldn't want to be the lawer defending that in court...
Edmund Cramp
--
http://www.emgsrus.com/graffiti.htm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Will Lowe
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 8:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [brlug-general] I knew Gates had to be involved...
>
>
> Here is a good writeup from the Open Source Initiative
> about SCO's and
> Micro$oft's atempt to re-write history.
>
> http://opensource.org/sco-vs-ibm.html
>
> Will Lowe
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "-ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 7:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [brlug-general] I knew Gates had to be involved...
>
>
> >
> > Haha, this chart has been hanging in my office for a few
> years. Didn't
> > know it was a big deal (http://www.levenez.com/wall), but
> i'll have to
> > send in a pic. I also have the following quote on there,
> don't remember
> > where it got it, and can't say that it's true, but it's funny:
> >
> > "Multics was actually the predecessor to UNIX. Ken
> Thompson and Dennis
> > Ritchie started working on UNIX when Bell Labs dropped
> out of Multics
> > development in 1969. The term "Unix" is attributed to
> Brian Kernighan,
> > and is a pun on Multics and eunuch, basically meaning
> Unix is 'Multics
> > without balls'..."
> >
> > -ray
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 19 May 2003, Will Lowe wrote:
> >
> > > If you want to see how crazy all this is look at this
> chart of Unix
> history.
> > > If a good lawyer can get OJ off then one ought to be
> able to prove that
> no
> > > one even owns Unix much less Linux. <Grin>
> > >
> > > http://www.levenez.com/unix/
> > >
> > > Will Lowe
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Dustin Puryear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 3:12 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [brlug-general] I knew Gates had to be involved...
> > >
> > >
> > > > At 02:59 PM 5/19/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > >On 2003.05.19 14:10 Tim Fournet wrote:
> > > > > > If it were BSD, then it would even be scarier, as
> code from the
> BSD
> > > > > > kernel could have been copied and placed in tons
> of closed-source
> apps
> > > > > > by now--really giving SCO cause to go on a witch hunt.
> > > > >You don't think this case has anything to do with
> reality, do you?
> Of
> > > the
> > > > >two systems, BSDs owes much more to Unix directly.
> The whole thing
> is a
> > > > >FUD fest designed to scare big dumb companies into Paladium.
> > > >
> > > > What? :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Puryear Information Technology
> > > > Windows, UNIX, and IT Consulting
> > > > http://www.puryear-it.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > General mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > General mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =-=-=-=-=
> > Ray DeJean http://www.r-a-y.org
> > Systems Engineer Southeastern
> Louisiana University
> > IBM Certified Specialist AIX Administration, AIX Support
> >
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =-=-=-=-=
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
>
