Dustin Puryear wrote: > This is just silly: > > Linux backers have reacted angrily, stating that SCO hasn't > identified any offending parts of the software. SCO says doing > that would let programmers change the software to hide evidence > of copying. "That's like saying, 'show us the fingerprints on the gun > so you can rub them off,' " Mr. McBride says. > > Unless I am mistaken these programmers would have to find all of the > source code for all past releases, delete it, and hope nobody else had > a copy. Yeah, that could happen. :)
Yeah, especially since kernel.org mirrors all the way back to Linux .01 -> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/Historic/old-versions/ Shannon > > > At 10:23 AM 5/19/2003 -0500, you wrote: > >> Figures... MS is going to buy a license from SCO and help their >> campaign.... >> >> http://online.wsj.com/article_email/0,,SB105329732841072600-H9jeoNmlaJ2oZymbXqHbK6Im4,00.html >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> General mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > > > --- > Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Puryear Information Technology > Windows, UNIX, and IT Consulting > http://www.puryear-it.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
