Tin foil hats, get out more?  Did I fall into some kind of Slashdot troll hole? 
 We don't need to be like this to each other.

On 2004.01.29 09:00 Doug Riddle wrote:
> 
> >--- John Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...
> > That's not science, that's politics. Or religion,
> > considering your zealotry. Have you even read the
> > analysis on how this virus works?
> > ...
> > Maybe you aren't aware of the huge numbers of emails
> > being sent. I've read estimates of 1 out of 12
> > emails
> > sent during this worm infestation are MyDoom.
> 
> OK, then, given that current estimates have spam
> running at 6 out of ten emails, then why isn't SPAM a
> Microsoft plot?  Hmm.  Does Bill want you to have a
> larger, er, ego?  Is mS trying to lower your mortgage
> rates?
> ...
> >  I can think of only reasons a
> >  virus would spoof A or B's address in mail sent
> >  off  my machine.
> > 
> > I'm afraid to ask.
> > 
...

> Reason C.  If you get email from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or diedie@@Imafreakingvirus.com
> you probably will not open it.  Or, I wouldn't anyway.
>  If I get one from John Hebert, I'll open it.  And if
> it has an attachment that didn't translate, I just
> might open that too.
> 
> That is the kicker though.  Would MS send you a manual
> virus?  "Pleze to click you here to scruz up you boxen
> mine fruend."
> 
> > 
... 
> We need help for this?  I thought we had enough
> aluminium hat wearers to take care or image problem
> ourselves.
> 
> > Please stop.
> > 
> > > They have lists of their
> > > "enemies" who advocate free software and
> > > occasionally complain when Microsoft failures and
> > > design flaws cause internet turmoil, restrictive
> > ISP
> > > policies, and utility blackouts.
> > 
> > Waitasec. You're kidding. Right? This is funny.
> 
> So, are the execs getting uzis and gas masks with
> their stock options, or is it cyanide pills with the
> keys to the executive washroom?
> > 
> > > They have already
> > > suckered CNN and others to run headlines about
> > > "Linux War Weapons", and others have run articles
> > > filled with giggling anarchist straw men.
> > 
> > Now I get it! That's pretty funny... I really hope
> > you're kidding.
> > 
> > > A
> > > miltibillion dollar press just used the latest
> > > Microsoft transmitted disease to smear people who
> > > give their work away without expectations of
> > reward.
> > 
> They're after the priests and red cross workers too! 
> This must be stopped!
> 
> > If you are not kidding, then you are one spooky
> > dude.
> > 
> > >  It's disgusting, but hopefully transparent enough
> > > to backfire.  
> > 
> > Please keep at least 100' away from me in the
> > future.
> > 
> > > So, is it true?  Shannon, were your machines
> > clean? 
> > > Has anyone else here been smeared by spoofing?  Is
> > > there enough mail lying around to build a solid
> > > statistical case?
> > 
> > Wow. I'm not sure how to respond to that. I've run
> > out
> 
> Dang it John, I told you to keep you aluminium hat on,
> now the rays got you man.
> 
> > 
> === message truncated ===
> 

Reply via email to