On Feb 17, 2008 7:51 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But visibility of the content and process very much IS part of "the Apache > Way." > > Most of the use cases mentioned so far for git, including some where people > are using it on top of SVN with ASF projects, run counter to ASF principles. > It is *NOT* in our best interests and practices for people to work in private > on bulk code, and periodically submit big changes. We want those changes > made in public view in Subversion branches where the Community can see the > work in progress, not when it is complete. We need to reeducate people who > believe otherwise. > > That said, I am not saying that people can't use whatever SVN client(s) they > want to use. I am saying that (a) the ASF has a uniform source control > infrastructure, which is currently based on SVN servers, and (b) our > practices mean that development is done in public, not done in private and > submitted en masse as a fait accompli. These statements are independent of > the SCM technology used by the ASF.
+1. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
