FWIW, this link was used by Sam during the discussion I referred to below - 
http://s.apache.org/QeN

Ralph

On Jan 2, 2012, at 11:29 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:

> 
> On Jan 2, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> 
>> On Jan 2, 2012 10:51 PM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Greg, I do not care one bit how much commit activity happens at Trac. As
>> long as there is some kind of active community it is improper to fork it
>> without their permission.
>> 
>> Eh? You ever read the "rules for revolutionaries" page? The basic concept
>> is: don't try to force two communities into one; when separate visions for
>> the project occur, then separate them.
>> 
>> I don't see it as our place to *judge* communities. If it is a fork, or a
>> corporate spin-out, or a move, or brand new... All Good. We provide a
>> temporary home in the Incubator to see if it can become a good, proper, and
>> healthy Apache community. We don't turn them away a-priori based on their
>> history.
> 
> Greg, this seems to be so much B.S as it apparently serves some particular 
> interest you have.  A PMC I am on had this exact conversation with board 
> members several months ago regarding a code base the project is dependent on 
> that is housed outside the ASF which we were considering bringing in as a 
> subproject. We were told that under no circumstances could we fork the code 
> without the "owner's" blessing, regardless of what the license allowed us to 
> do. To me, this answer is black and white. 
>> 
>> In my mind, the Trac core has slowed, and it needs revitalization and a new
>> vision. Others may disagree, and do, and that's fine. But I don't think it
>> is fine for us to make judgements of communities (or nascent ones!) who
>> want to try something new. To pick up and go in a direction that others are
>> not heading, or do not have the time to make.
> 
> I have no idea what you are saying. You ARE making a judgement on a community 
> by saying it isn't active enough and deserves to be forked.  Again, some of 
> your fellow board members have said the ASF isn't the place for that.
> 
> Ralph
> 

Reply via email to