> > Did the Zipkin project file an SGA? If no, the contribution is all ICLA > based and you are correct.
> If yes, then AFAIK Justin is correct, but there may be other edge cases. > There was no SGA. This particular codebase was also primarily authored by iCLA signers. In Zipkin, we did an odd thing which was the IP stuff up front. Not every TLP may follow policy to the letter. Issues may have been missed > in the past. A TLP may not have gone through the Incubator. You are free to > examine the history of every project’s NOTICE file. If you do not accept > the collective advice here and wish a ruling then you can ask the legal > affairs committee at legal-disc...@apache.org by filing a LEGAL JIRA. But > wait a bit to see. People who would answer there are as likely to answer > here. > Most importantly, I am trying to figure out if advice is collective or not. This is mainly an issue of understanding if all Justin's comments are to be taken as a collective without others saying anything. We are lucky to have people speak a lot but it would be nice to have especially detailed points asked as "yeah you should do this" especially when others are clearly not. I hope you saw my other thread opened as I doubt discussing also here will get the same visibility into what could become a crisis if not watched over well.
