Gotcha, Let us circle back on this and provide more context and updates to address any concerns.
Best, Giannis On Wed, 27 May 2026 at 3:30 AM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Giannis, > > To answer your direct question: both, but they are related. > > The process concern is that the graduation PMC list was not revisited > during incubation. It largely reflects the original donation proposal, with > one addition. A graduation is the right moment to ask who has earned PMC > membership through their contributions during incubation, and that > reflection does not appear to have happened. > > The composition concern follows from that. If the community had done that > reflection, I would expect to see some active committers elevated to the > PMC, and I would expect to see harder questions asked about whether all > original PPMC members have remained sufficiently engaged to warrant > inclusion in the graduation PMC. > > The growth of the committer base is a positive. But committers and PMC > members serve different roles. A healthy committer pipeline does not > resolve whether the proposed PMC composition reflects merit and sustained > engagement during incubation. > > What would give me confidence is the PPMC doing that reflection now, > before the vote, and updating the proposed list accordingly. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
