Hi Giannis, To answer your direct question: both, but they are related.
The process concern is that the graduation PMC list was not revisited during incubation. It largely reflects the original donation proposal, with one addition. A graduation is the right moment to ask who has earned PMC membership through their contributions during incubation, and that reflection does not appear to have happened. The composition concern follows from that. If the community had done that reflection, I would expect to see some active committers elevated to the PMC, and I would expect to see harder questions asked about whether all original PPMC members have remained sufficiently engaged to warrant inclusion in the graduation PMC. The growth of the committer base is a positive. But committers and PMC members serve different roles. A healthy committer pipeline does not resolve whether the proposed PMC composition reflects merit and sustained engagement during incubation. What would give me confidence is the PPMC doing that reflection now, before the vote, and updating the proposed list accordingly. Kind Regards, Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
