Notice that they implemented the database operations as stored procedures. Well, yeah, that's going to be faster than JDBC, but it's not quite a fair comparison....
Yours,
Tom Copeland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-317-5193
Jon Stevens
<jon@latchkey To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.com> cc:
Subject: Re: [OT] MS makes a better
PetShop...
10/31/2001
04:30 PM
Please
respond to
"Jakarta
General List"
on 10/31/01 1:19 PM, "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/compare/petshop.asp
>
> Its not a very fair comparison (suprise suprise) but from a quick look at
> the source code, it seems MS achieve their performance gains by not using
> EJBs :-)
Ok. Now that is funny. I got a good laugh out of that one. Hi Justy!
> I wonder what the figures would look like if the PetStore were
implemented
> along similar techniques using just regular JavaBeans and JSP...
I wonder what the figures would look like if the PetStore were implemented
along similar techniques using just Turbine and Velocity...
Velocity already had results show it to be faster than JSP.
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email may contain confidential and proprietary information which is
for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received this email in
error, please notify the sender and delete this email from your computer.
Any review, distribution or retransmission of or reliance on this email by
anyone other than the intended recipient is forbidden.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
