Hi:

I wasn't trying to be political at all.  I've just been frustrated by my
experiences with Weblogic, but I still use it:  I generally off load
image type conversion and PDF generation to the appserver.

Please don't take the argument so personally.  

I'm not an egomaniac and I wasn't trying to insult you personally in any
way.  

So, I'm driven to a bit of exaggeration and overstatement at times
especially when criticizing over-hyped technology like EJB.  I've got
lots of problems with XML and JSP too, if anyone else wants to fight :) 

Cheers,

Aaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 1:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
> 
> 
> So by your response I take it you don't know how I can submit a
project to
> jakarta?
> 
> Did you even read the whole post? Keep the politics off the discussion
> boards. Especially comments as such;
> 
> "Not arguing with you here.  (These discussion just provoke stupid
> comments like that.)". I guess good grammar is not indicative of
> intelligence. Besides, I was using sarcasm to make the point to help
> deflate
> your oversided ego.
> 
> Your smarter than all the developers on every App server and my
comment is
> stupid. Everyone that uses any J2EE technologies is a moron and your
the
> smartest person ever to exist. Ok, fine. Whatever you want. Your a
winner.
> Just keep the politics off the discussion thread.
> 
> I've never contributed to jakarta or any open source forum but thought
I
> would check it out and see what it's all about. With attitudes like
this
> I'm
> beginning to think this might be a mistake. I run into enough
egomaniacs
> in
> my job without dealing with these assholes when I'm just trying to
help
> out
> the community for free. Why should I take shit when I'm not getting
paid?
> This is exactly why politics should be off the forum. It's
discouraging
> for
> people that want to get involved.
> 
> 
> >From: "Aaron Smuts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "'Jakarta General List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: EJB = bad = MS.net
> >Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:26:37 -0500
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Knowing my qualifications here is my response to Aaron's post whom
I
> >have
> > > summarized with this one line from him;
> > > "No matter what you try to do with EJB, I can provide a simpler,
> >faster,
> > > more scalable, and cheaper solution."
> > >
> >
> >I was obviously overstating the matter.  I guess I had too much wine.
> >Ok. Let's be fair, 98% of what most people need from an appserver can
be
> >done in other ways.
> >
> >I think that comment was actually in reference to the specific
features
> >listed as beneficial about EJB. ?
> >
> > > Wow, you should start your own company. Your obviously much
smarter
> >than
> > > the
> > > 100 or so developers that make Weblogic or the 50 or so that make
> >JBoss,
> > > or
> > > the ? 100 ? or so that make Websphere, etc.
> >
> >Not arguing with you here.  (These discussion just provoke stupid
> >comments like that.)
> >
> >You can make a Java Bean
> > > container that can handle
> >
> > >clustering,
> >
> >Oh ya, weblogic clustering is so nice.  You have to practically take
> >down the entire cluster in 6.0 to update.
> >
> > >fail over,
> >
> >Got what I need in a load balancer and in JCS.  There are some
> >transactional failover features in appservers that are nice though.
> >
> > > caching,
> >
> >Got it: JCS
> >
> > > persistence,
> >
> >Got it: JDBC
> >
> > > transactional services,
> >
> >Got what I need in the JDBC.
> >
> > > security, etc.
> >
> >Got it:  RBAC
> >
> > >better than all those people?
> >
> >Most of this can be done fairly simply and most people just don't
need
> >what the appserver vendors are selling.
> >
> >If you had said 2 phase commit, then I'd make concessions.
> >
> > >Wow,
> > > your the man.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> > >If I could create a product by myself better than all those
> > > people and create a billion dollar company I would. Seems stupid
not
> >to?
> > > Kind of strange you call 'people' stupid
> >
> >Just to be clear.  I never called anyone stupid.  I never used the
word.
> >That was in the subject line that I replied to.  I didn't notice it
till
> >someone else replied.  I would have taken it out. (as I just did.)
> >
> >and claim you can do better than
> > > these teams at creating this monumental amount of complex code
> >
> >No.  I use a good amount of clear code.
> >
> >  yet you
> > > don't
> > > do it, even though it could bring you great wealth? Ok then, how
about
> > > open
> > > source?
> >
> >Oh, I am a contributor to a couple of Jakarta projects but have no
> >intension of building an appserver.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Aaron
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to